How Does the Ending of Animal Farm Reflect George Orwell’s Views on Stalinism?

Rate this post


In the realm of political literature, few works have achieved the level of impact and relevance as George Orwell’s novel, Animal Farm. Published in 1945, Orwell’s allegorical masterpiece serves as a scathing critique of totalitarianism, particularly Stalinism. By examining the ending of Animal Farm, we can unravel the layers of Orwell’s views on Stalinism and understand the message he sought to convey.

George Orwell's critique of Stalinism is evident in his written works.
George Orwell’s critique of Stalinism is evident in his written works.

George Orwell’s Critique of Stalinism

To comprehend the depth of Orwell’s perspective, we must first delve into his personal experiences and political beliefs. Born Eric Arthur Blair, Orwell witnessed firsthand the rise of totalitarian regimes during the 20th century. His time in Spain during the Spanish Civil War, where he fought against Franco’s fascist forces, solidified his opposition to authoritarianism.

Orwell was a staunch advocate for democratic socialism and vehemently opposed the oppressive nature of Stalinism. His works, including Animal Farm, were driven by his unwavering commitment to exposing the dangers of totalitarian ideologies and their impact on society.

The ending of Animal Farm is filled with symbolism and surprises.
The ending of Animal Farm is filled with symbolism and surprises.

The Ending of Animal Farm

Before we can fully grasp the significance of the ending, let’s briefly recap the events that transpired in Animal Farm. The story begins with a group of oppressed animals overthrowing their human farmer, Mr. Jones, and establishing their own self-governing society on the farm. However, as time passes, the intelligent pigs, led by Napoleon, seize power and gradually adopt the same oppressive tactics they once fought against.

As we approach the ending, the pigs’ corruption becomes more evident. They manipulate the principles of Animalism, the ideology that initially united the animals, for their own benefit. The final chapters witness the pigs’ collaboration with humans, symbolizing the betrayal of the revolution’s ideals.

Read More:   Who Takes Care of the Farm When They Are Away and How Do They Make Homesteading Profitable Enough To

Orwell’s Views Reflected in the Ending

In analyzing the ending of Animal Farm, we can discern Orwell’s scathing indictment of Stalinism. By examining the fate of the farm and its transformation, we witness a parallel to the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule. The pigs’ gradual shift from revolutionary leaders to oppressive dictators mirrors the way Stalin consolidated power and abandoned the principles of the Bolshevik revolution.

Orwell’s portrayal of the pigs’ behavior serves as a damning critique of Stalin’s regime. The pigs, led by Napoleon, represent the ruling elite who exploit the proletariat, mirroring the exploitative nature of Stalinism. Their manipulation of language, revisionism of history, and use of propaganda to control and deceive the other animals reflect the tactics employed by Stalin to maintain his grip on power.

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions

What is Stalinism and how does it relate to Animal Farm?

Stalinism refers to the political ideology and practices associated with Joseph Stalin’s rule in the Soviet Union from the 1920s until his death in 1953. It is characterized by totalitarianism, censorship, purges, and the cult of personality surrounding Stalin. Animal Farm serves as an allegory for Stalinism, portraying the degeneration of a revolution into a repressive regime.

Did Orwell support or condemn Stalinism?

Orwell vehemently condemned Stalinism. As a democratic socialist, he believed in the principles of equality, justice, and democracy. His experiences in Spain, coupled with his extensive research on Stalin’s regime, solidified his opposition to totalitarianism and his commitment to exposing its dangers.

Why did Orwell choose to end the novel the way he did?

Orwell’s ending serves as a sobering reminder of the inherent corruption within power structures. By showcasing the pigs’ betrayal and collaboration with humans, he emphasizes the cyclical nature of tyranny. The ending highlights the ease with which revolutionary ideals can be corrupted and how those in power often prioritize their self-interest over the collective good.

Read More:   How to Convert a Farm & Barns: Repurposing Old Structures for a New Purpose


In conclusion, the ending of Animal Farm serves as a powerful reflection of George Orwell’s views on Stalinism. Through the allegorical tale of the farm animals’ revolution and subsequent betrayal, Orwell exposes the dangers of totalitarian ideology and the ease with which power corrupts. Animal Farm stands as a timeless reminder of the importance of vigilance and the need to critically examine those in authority to safeguard against the erosion of democratic principles. Orwell’s critique of Stalinism through the ending of Animal Farm continues to resonate, urging readers to remain vigilant against the allure of oppressive regimes.

Back to top button